Quote:
Originally Posted by lirvavril
hahaha ! tbh , I drew Audrey Hepburn with the lights turned off and in 25 minutes !! But Rihanna was like hmmmm ... about 1 hour ??
plus i'm always distracted and in a hurry when i sketch .. i'm not that serious about it .. but i wish i was !! 
|
oh hahaha XD well when you think about it, the quicker you draw something probably means you were a lot focused and in tune with the drawing then you are with a drawing that took you an hour. cuz you could have been distracted a lot and werent focused within that hour; thats why you took so long to finish it...just a theory.
that why I see the audrey one looks more focused and the rihanna one more lazy? for the lack of a better word. like it was more difficult so you just did it to finish it?? meh im no art critic hahaha
Quote:
Originally Posted by cool
Actually I like rihanna better.. but then i don't know who she is and i just like the artwork there.. the audrey hepburn one didn't look quite like her cause i know her.. haha.. but is it water color? charcoal? pastel? pencil?? can't tell...
|
I don't like it when portraits of famous people look exactly the same as the person, I like it when the portraits capture the "essence" of the star.
I get that from the audrey one but not the rihanna one, rihanna is more glamourous...if you get what I mean. lol